poprzedni wątek | następny wątek

pl.soc.prawo

2011-04-21 20:22	LEGALLY SPEAKING, THIS IS ' FRESH EVIDENCE.' AGAINT BRITISH MOTIVE	.
IS THIS NEW EVIDENCE IN KIDNAPPING THE POLISH GOVERMENT IN APRIL 2010? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Washington DCMoscowBeijingBeirutBrusselsPrintCancel Proliferation Analysis Debating NATO's Nuclear Policy Proliferation Analysis, April 29, 2010 Thursday, April 29, 2010 Editor's Note: On April 22-23, the foreign ministers from NATO's 28 member states gathered in Tallinn, Estonia, for a two-day meeting. In the first article, Oliver Schmidt, based in Germany, reflects on the NATO talks and the utility of maintaining U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe. In the second article, Lukasz Kulesa, from Poland, discusses how the Obama administration's Nuclear Posture Review might affect NATO's nuclear policy. The Utility of U.S. Tactical Nuclear Weapons in NATO: A European Perspective By Oliver Schmidt During the recent meeting of NATO's foreign ministers and secretaries of state in Tallinn, Estonia, it became increasingly clear that there is disagreement over the fundamental purpose of NATO and the utility of maintaining its tactical nuclear weapons. The debate encompassed three main views. First, NATO should remain a regional military alliance that focuses on the territorial integrity of its member states. Second, NATO is primarily a regional military alliance, but should also be used for humanitarian intervention if its member states decide to do so. Third, NATO is more than a regional military alliance; it represents "Western" values and should therefore expand its membership and geographical focus to include like-minded states worldwide. What these three positions reveal is that NATO does not have a common understanding of risks and threats. While the countries of central and Eastern Europe still fear the perceived threat of Russia, the countries of Western and Southern Europe are more focused on new security challenges stemming mainly from non-state actors. The result of this security divide is the current controversy over the nearly 200 remaining U.S. tactical nuclear weapons stationed in Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, and Germany. Eastern European countries like Poland view these weapons as a sign that the United States is taking the mutual defense clause enshrined in Article 5 of NATO's charter seriously. As a U.S. ally, and perhaps given Iran's nuclear ambitions, Turkey is also very cautious about the possible withdrawal of U.S. nuclear weapons from its soil. More fundamental is the concern in Europe over the obvious imbalance between NATO's 200 tactical nuclear weapons and Russia?s estimated 3,000 non-strategic weapons. So what should be the way ahead? Germany?s current position is to lead efforts for the removal of tactical nuclear weapons from Europe. This was formulated in the November 2009 agreement that brought Germany's ruling parties into coalition, which came as a surprise for many NATO countries. The German coalition agreement was, in fact, an attempt to gain popular domestic support by advancing a nuclear disarmament agenda. In Germany, as in many other European countries, the majority of the population favors the withdrawal. But Germany could have simply resolved the issue over time. The only German weapons system capable of delivering nuclear weapons is the Tornado strike fighter, which will be phased out by 2030 at the latest. The new multi-role Euro Fighter, which will replace the Tornado, is not currently designed to deliver tactical nuclear weapons. For many Germans, then, the question is, given the maximum range of these strike fighters, what could they possibly hit that is not a NATO or European country? By February 2010 the Netherlands, Norway, Belgium, and Luxembourg joined Germany's proposal for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons and debated the issue at the NATO meeting in Tallinn. However, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has stated clearly that there will be no withdrawal without an agreement with Russia about their tactical nuclear arsenal in Europe. In order to reach an agreement, it would be a helpful and necessary step to resolve the critical status of the Treaty on the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE). Russia postponed its treaty commitments after NATO member countries did not ratify the adapted CFE Treaty, which addresses the significant changes in Europe's military balance after the collapse of the Warsaw Pact. The NATO countries, on the other hand, demand the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgia and Moldova in accordance with the 1999 Istanbul commitments before they ratify the adapted CFE. Russia will rely on nuclear weapons to compensate for the imbalance as long as it perceives a conventional superiority of NATO forces in Europe. Only when this Russian perception is assuaged will it be possible to find a solution regarding the status of tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. What remains is the need for providing reliable U.S. and NATO commitments to collective defense, especially to Poland and Turkey. Dealing with these threat perceptions will require finding ways to develop a security architecture that can deter today's threats without anachronistic nuclear thinking. Oliver Schmidt works for the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP) in Berlin, Germany's oldest non-partisan, non-governmental think tank. ... Who provoked this way 2 weeks after kidnapping the Polish Goverment? Why Riga?Roma Locuta, Causa Finita? The Nuclear Posture Review and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe By Lukasz Kulesa Last week, the foreign ministers of NATO?s 28 member states gathered in Estonia for informal talks. There was one especially controversial issue on the agenda: the future of NATO?s nuclear policy. Included in the discussions was the question of whether NATO should continue to rely on the approximately 200 U.S. B-61 nuclear bombs stored in Europe as part of U.S. extended deterrence. The message of the meeting does not herald any far-reaching change. The problem will be further discussed until a consensus is found within NATO. In theory, all options are still on the table. But in practice, a compromise seems to be in the making at NATO--one which would seriously disappoint the proponents of an early withdrawal, but is the only solution which would prove acceptable to all of NATO?s member states. The position of the United States is crucial to chart NATO?s course on this issue. The recently released U.S. Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) offers a number of hints on how Washington might influence the alliance?s nuclear strategy towards a gradual change rather than a revolution.' KTO TO JEST TEN RADCA PRAWNY, KTORY TAK SIE ZACHOWUJE W CZASIE ZALOBY W POSLCE. CZYIM RADCA ON JEST? 'Łukasz KuleszaAbsolwent Wydziału Prawa na Uniwersytecie w Białymstoku. Od 2007 r. aplikant radcowski w Okręgowej Izbie Radców Prawnych w Kielcach. Łukasz Kulesza specjalizuje się w prawie cywilnym, gospodarczym oraz handlowym. Zajmuje się obsługą spółek kapitałowych, prawem zobowiązań, transakcjami handlowymi, prawem upadłościowym, oraz zagadnieniami administracyjnymi w obszarze ochrony przyrody i ochrony środowiska. Uczestniczy w procesach sądowych z zakresu prawa cywilnego, w szczególności gospodarczego oraz postępowaniach administracyjnych i sądowo-administracyjnych. Z Kancelarią związany od 2008 r. Operuje językiem angielskim. W toku prowadzonej praktyki kieruje się mottem: Neminem laedit, qui suo iure utitur (Nikogo nie krzywdzi, ten kto korzysta ze swego prawa). AND , MIND YOU THAT IS ART NOVUEAU ( 'MLODA POLSKA POST ROMATYCYSTYCZNY TREND OMIJANY BARDZO SKRZERTNIE PRZEZ FOGGY CITY, THAT PHONIES SELF IN ) TEN LUKASZ JEST BARDZO UPARTYM LACINOZNAWCA TERAZ. MUSIMY SZUKAV DALEJ: JAK: NAJPIERW JAK UCIEKLA 'NOWA POLSKA' Z POLSKI . The style was influenced strongly by Czech artist Alphonse Mucha, when Mucha produced a lithographed poster, which appeared on 1 January 1895 in the streets of Paris as an advertisement for the play Gismonda by Victorien Sardou, featuring Sarah Bernhardt.[6] It popularized the new artistic style and its creator to the citizens of Paris. Initially named Style Mucha, (Mucha Style), his style soon became known as Art Nouveau.[7] Art Nouveau was most popular in Europe and the British Islands, but its influence was global. AHA! NAPRAWDE? MY JEDNAK ZAGLADALISMY DO LONDYNU? GDZIE TAM SA JAKIES REGUISITY? Hence, it is known in various guises with frequent localised tendencies.[8] In France, Hector Guimard's Paris metro entrances were of art nouveau style and Emile Gallé practiced the style in Nancy. Victor Horta had a decisive effect on architecture in Belgium.[9] Magazines like Jugend helped publicize the style in Germany, especially as a graphic artform, while the Vienna Secessionists influenced art and architecture throughout Austria-Hungary. Art Nouveau was also a style of distinct individuals such as Gustav Klimt, Charles Rennie Mackintosh, Alphonse Mucha, René Lalique, Antoni Gaudí and Louis Comfort Tiffany, each of whom interpreted it in their own manner.[10][11]" NIE MA I JUZ. NARESZCIE 'PHON' AND ' LAND OF CROWD OF THE ST. STEPHEN.' AND THERE IS AUSTRALIAN POLAND 9 REMEMBER AROUDN TEH YEAR OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AUSTRIA AHS CLAIMED PART OF POLAND TO APPARENTLY STILL RETURMN PART AND PART KEEP WITHOUT A GOOD REASON - THERE WAS THE BIRTH OF THIS ARTISTIC CONVENTION. Name in official languages of Austria-HungaryNames of the Dual Monarchy in officially recognized languages of its citizens: Croatian: Austro-Ugarska Czech: Rakousko-Uhersko German: Österreich-Ungarn Hungarian: Ausztria-Magyarország Italian: Austria-Ungheria Polish: Austro-Węgry - EURECA! Romanian: Austro-Ungaria Serbian: A?????-???????/Austro-Ugarska Slovak: Rakúsko-Uhorsko Slovene: Avstro-Ogrska Turkish: Avusturya-Macaristan Ukrainian: ??????-???????? (transliterated: Avstro-Uhorshchina) WCIAZ - DLACZEGO KULESZA ( LUKASZ ONLY) MOWI PO LACINIE POLSKA MIALA WPLYWE W REJONEI RYSKIM PRZEZ 3 POLSKIE WOJEWODZTWA TAM JAKO CZESC HOLLY ROMAN EMPIRE LUB PRZECIWNIE ( W ZALEZNOSCI KTIORY POPRZADEOK SWIATA OBOWIAZUJE). W 2 TYG PO NAPADZIE NA POLAKOW, RADCA PRAWNY NIE PAMIETA JUZ NIC O POLSKIM INTERESIE W REJONIE; O POROZUMIENIACH RYSKICH I O POLAKACH ZABITYCH W REJONIE WTEDY I TEARZ ( JESLI IM TERAZ WIERZYC).POROZUMIENIA RYSKIE ZOSTALY WPROWADZONE W ZYCIE, ALE REJON RYSKI ZOSTAL SEPAROWANY I ZOSTAL POSKIM WYJATKIEM TAM - STAD BUSH WPROWADZA NATO ALE NIE WCZESNIEJ NIZ PO PORWANIU POLSKIEGO RZADU, KTORY ZAZADAL WIZUALNEJ INSPEKCJI TERENU FOR THE REASONS GIVEN NOW BY TGHE NEW PECE FOUNDATION - THERE WAS NO INFORMATION SUFFICUENTLY EXPLAING THE SITUATION IN THE REGION ( THERE SI MORE INFORMATION ABOUT IT TOO) LEGALLY SPEAKING, THIS IS ' FRESH EVIDENCE.' .... CAN COMBINATION OF THESE FACTS BE ACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE OF BRITISH MOTIVE FOR KIDNAPING OF POLISH GOVERMENT MANIFESTED IN THESE SEEKINGB THE PHONY INFLUENCE OF THE ROAD ( THAT WAS ENGLISCH CHANNEL THAT THEY HAD AND NOT 'THE CORRIDOR' - POSLKI KORYTARZA NADBALTYCKI) AND OF THE MAP ( LIKE THAT STYPHEN PHONY CROWN - THE INDIVIDUAL THAT PLAYS 'STYPHEN STEFAN BE IN POLISH STEPHEN IN PHILADELPHIA - AS CHURCH-' READY TO DECOMPOSE THAN POLAND IN AUSTRIA, HAS DONE THAT ELSWHERE VIA PHONY FANTACIES OF PHONY CROWN; WHAT THIS ONE JOKER IS? I AM GATHERING FAST THAT HE IS ALIVE AND HAVE A CLUE). skomentuj

nowsze

1

starsze

Tytuł	Autor	Data
Maroon 5 - It Won`t Be Soon Before Long Free Mp3 Download legally	rfkamra	2007-07-20 21:51